Project Risk Management-Btechnd

 

Non-compliantPoor/inadequateBasicAdequateGoodExcellentMark
ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS (out of 60)00 to 4445 to 5859 to 6768 to 7677 to 90/90
1.  Describe the organisational and project context for which you are preparing the annotated bibliographyNo description is provided.The description of the organisational and project context is poor.The description of the organisational and project context is basic.The description of the organisational and project context is adequate and permits some understanding of the context.The description of the organisational and project context is good and permits an understanding of the context.The description of the organisational and project context is excellent and permits a full understanding of the context. 
2.  Annotated blibliographies 
A full reference of each artefact that is to be reviewed at the commencement of the bibliographyThe references are not provided.The references are not correct and/or not complete.The references are adequate but are not fully correct and/or complete.The references are complete and comply fully with Harvard AGPS6 
Explain the articles’ focus or purposeThere is no explanation of the articles’ focus nor purpose.

The resources chosen are not relevant to the topic and the organizational context.

The explanation of the articles’ focus and purpose is poor.

The resources chosen are not really relevant to the topic and the organizational context.

The explanation of the articles’ focus and purpose is basic.

The resources chosen are somewhat relevant to the topic and the organizational context.

The explanation of the articles’ focus and purpose is adequate.

The resources chosen are mostly relevant to the topic and the organizational context.

The explanation of the articles’ focus and purpose is good.

The resources chosen are relevant to the topic and the organizational context.

The explanation of the articles’ focus and purpose is excellent.

The resources chosen are highly relevant to the topic and the organizational context.

 
Summarise the research approach / method or source of informationThere is no summary of the research approach / method nor source of information.The summary of the research method and/or information sources is poor.The summary of the research method and/or information sources is basic.The summary of the research method and/or information sources is adequate.The summary of the research method and/or information sources is good.The summary of the research method and/or information sources is excellent. 
A critical reflection on the value, reliability, completeness and limitations of the resource. Clearly describe the strengths and weaknesses of the resource.The critical reflection on the value, reliability, completeness and limitations of the resource is not provided. The discussion on the strengths and weaknesses of the resource is not provided.The critical reflection on the value, reliability, completeness and limitations of the resource is poor. The discussion on the strengths and weaknesses of the resource is poor.The critical reflection on the value, reliability, completeness and limitations of the resource is basic. The discussion on the strengths and weaknesses of the resource is basic.The critical reflection on the value, reliability, completeness and limitations of the resource is adequate. The discussion on the strengths and weaknesses of the resource is adequate.The critical reflection on the value, reliability, completeness and limitations of the resource is good. Some gaps are indicated. The discussion on the strengths and weaknesses of the resource is good.The critical reflection on the value, reliability, completeness and limitations of the resource is excellent. Gaps are clearly indicated.The discussion on the strengths and weaknesses of the resource is excellent. 
Justification of why this resource is important in the context of the development of your PMO’s proceduresThe justification of the importance of the resource to the organizational context and project risk management is not provided.The justification of the importance of the resource to the organizational context and project risk management is poor.The justification of the importance of the resource to the organizational context and project risk management is basic.The justification of the importance of the resource to the organizational context and project risk management is adequately argued.The justification of the importance of the resource to the organizational context and project risk management is well argued.The justification of the importance of the resource to the organizational context and project risk management is excellently argued. 
3. ConclusionsNo conclusion is provided.The conclusion is poor.The conclusion is basic.The conclusion is adequate and is a summative evaluation of the bibliographies.The conclusion is good and is a good summative evaluation of the bibliographies.The conclusion is excellent and is a very good summative evaluation of the bibliographies. 
Reference listThere is no reference list.The reference list follows some of the USQ standards but is not complete and/or contains numerous errors.The reference list follows most of the USQ standards but is not complete and/or contains some errors.The reference list follows the USQ standards but is not totally complete and/or contains some errors.The reference list follows the USQ standards and is complete and contains few errors.The reference list follows the USQ standards and is free from errors. 
PRESENTATION OF REPORT (out of 10)00 to 4 5 to 7 8 to 10/10
Cover sheet (in addition to the mark sheet)No cover sheet providedLimited information provided Adequate information provided Comprehensive information provided with no errors nor omissions. 
Table of contents – includes all sections and subsections, list of references, and with page numberingNo table of contents providedIncorrect or incomplete use of Table of contents Adequate use of Table of contents Correct use of table of contents 
Section Numbering – section and sub-section numbering to comply with normal conventions (e.g. set text  by Summers & Smith – Communications Skills Handbook)No section numbering at allLittle or no effective usage of section numbering Adequate usage of section numbering Correct usage of section numbering 
Harvard referencing system (including reference list) – is used and conforms to Harvard style as defined on USQ Library website (e.g. alphabetical order)No use of Harvard referencing systemPoor or inadequate use of Harvard system of referencingBasic use of Harvard system of referencingAdequate use of Harvard systemGood use of Harvard systemComprehensive use of Harvard system in accordance with conventions of AGPS 6 style 
Page Numbering – page numbering to comply with normal conventions (e.g. set text  by Summers & Smith – Communications Skills Handbook)No page numbering at allIncorrect use of page numbering Adequate use of page numbering Correct use of page numbering 
Language Skills – grammar, spelling, clear and concise writing style, correct punctuationVery poor language skillsPoor language skillsAdequate language skillsExcellent language skills 
Word countSignificantly over or under nominated word count Slightly over or under word count margins (+/- 10%) Within word count margins 
* Total Assessment Mark (out of 100)

 

       

 

/100

 

Penalties applied to…Marks to be deducted for…Range of penaltyActual deduction
Mark sheet – to be attached to front of assignmentNo mark sheet10 
Turnitin Report – to be submitted with assignmentNo Turnitin originality report

(mark of 1/100 allocated until report submitted)

10 
 ** Total Deducted Mark (TDM)  

 

Order Now

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

1 Step 1
GET INSTANT ASSIGNMENT HELP BY PHD EXPERTS FROM UNITED KINGDOM
keyboard_arrow_leftPrevious
Nextkeyboard_arrow_right