Dissertation of Laws against Animal Cruelty and for protecting Animal
The possible conditions about laws to stand against animal cruelty and for protecting animal feeders have the potentials of widespread changes, as well as some similarities among different countries. This effectively gives enough reason for launching a research, which would present effective outcomes and results, which would present some important answers to the existing unfulfilled questions. Through careful contextual factors and conditions about, the research showcase the centrality and umbrella-like influence of animal cruelty laws to actual manifestations like used for protecting animal feeders. Additionally, other considerations were central in portraying the circumstances and conditions as well.
When tackling the topic about laws concerning animals, there is a legitimate challenge since this covers a wide area of many topics comprising entire countries’ numerous legal codes and statutes. It is why this dissertation is generally focused upon two distinct yet interrelated topics. Animal cruelty, by normative view of the law, is the infliction by humans the commission or omission of suffering and/or harm toward non-humans (Sauder, 2000). Providing to protection for animal feeders generally relate to individuals or parties who take to providing necessary food for consumption to non-humans. Such people are generally threatened by a number of external forces actions like verbal abuse, physical violence as well as constructed or derived legal action like threats for eviction (Li & Davey, 2013). Nevertheless to properly understand these would require getting into the umbrella concepts like animal rights and animal welfare respectively.
1.1 Animal Rights and Welfare in terms of preventing cruelty and protecting feeders
The point about including the ideas, concepts, questions etc. regarding the treatment and behaviors against animals included some questions being presented throughout human history. For instance, Leonardo Da Vinci’s notebooks displayed the emotion of anger he felt towards humanity raising animals for slaughter. However, French philosopher Rene Descartes believed that non-humans or animals are ‘functioning automata’, basically meaning that they are complex machines with no soul, reason or mind to actually compare with humans (Srinivasan, 2013). Nevertheless, it was Charles Darwin’s seminal theory of evolution, which fully painted the picture of the relationship that humans had with other species. Despite what Descartes had claimed before, there was noted sign usage in complex forms, use of tools and a certain extent of self-consciousness, which were evident within some animals (Sauder, 2000). Social, moral and mental orientation is evident under the theory of evolution for animals; however, as noted by contemporary philosopher Nigel Warburton, humans have sought to use animals as they see fit with the dominance of justifying their underlying differences from human beings.
Animal rights and welfare is mostly based upon the following terms, and often end up point to the fact that capacity of suffering constitutes the main focus of discussion. This is the current point of basis that laws against animal cruelty and for protecting animal feeders have become so prominent under judicial conditions and statements in so many places and nations (Srinivasan, 2013). The notion of life-hood, and the conditions of suffering that animals have to experience has immense magnitude in terms of occurrence. Taking, for example, the questions about animal cruelty could constitute legitimate concerns about the conditions, policies and functions of factory farms in general (Sauder, 2000). Or, they could potentially involve a random act of inflicting physical violence in the hopes of gaining something, such as entertainment in circus or video. Additionally, the point about inflicting cruelty could be seen as an act or behavior to be attained as an end by one, which also constitutes a legitimate case of animal cruelty.
The need for protecting animal feeders generally originate from wider social concerns about recognizing the concepts of animal rights and welfare. It applies to people specifically in terms of protecting those who satisfy the needs of animals from a specific perspectives. There are certain animal species who have been first domesticated by humans, and then eventually remain within the human society (Srinivasan, 2013). It could be seen as people owning pets, or stray dogs and cats that remain localized in an area, depending directly upon humans for their survival. Generally speaking, laws are aimed to those who actually help in surviving with the term animal feeders generally meaning those who provide food. However, in such a case of concerns, there have been many instances of other humans looking for ways to prevent humans in terms of actually see through their motivations and their resultant actions.
So, both these topic areas are covered in the law in many countries across the world, but the main question of this research focuses if there actually has been proper coverage of legal policies and codes in such fashion. From the previous paragraphs, it is quite evident that the occurrences of challenges and cases under law (Srinivasan, 2013). The main point of question would be to seek out and understand whether laws from different countries actually recognize the scenario (Srinivasan, 2013), and is able to convey judgment with proper orientation and recognition of animal rights and welfare respectively.
1.2 How Different Countries present the Laws that prevent Animal and Protect the Animal Feeders
The variations under the laws about the potential provision of recognizing legal constructions under both these conditions and circumstances are highly relevant and consequential. India, for example, launched the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (PCA) Act in 1960, and it has become the primary legal basis of seeking proper animal rights and welfare in the country (Sorenson, 2003). Section 11 specifically provides the grounds for animal cruelty making it illegal to inflict unnecessary pain or suffering or other causes, which could be experienced by the animals (Srinivasan, 2013). For a long time, the details of this Act was tantamount to a number of contradicting positions and circumstances. These were, however, changed with the Indian Animal Welfare Act, 2011, which sought to classify animal cruelty as an offence and actually increased the fine to a minimum of 10,000 INR on first time offences (Srinivasan, 2013). However, the still active Act is still operable under the indication of opening up possible exceptions like the killing of animals for food and for different religious purposes of tradition and/ceremony (World Wildlife Fund, 2020). These perspectives leave a great deal of opportunities for egregious actions of animal cruelty to actually not receive a great deal of prosecution and the achievement of justice.
Sections 428 and 429 of the PCA, 1960 mentions that it is illegal to cause any injury or maiming to animals, even those that are stray and live close to human proximity (Li & Davey, 2013). Moreover, Section 11 ensures that it is illegal to poison any animal regardless of their state. However, as one can note that there is no specific provision in the law for protecting animal feeders in the country in what is their lawful right to explicitly do so (Sorenson, 2003). Only the point of the Animal Welfare Board of India issuing recognizable Identification Documents have possible notion of preventing harassment from other people (World Wildlife Fund, 2020). But, one can evidently view the apparent gaps under this legal provision, as it leaves a great deal of options open for the many actors in attacking and preventing animal feeders.
In the United States of America, there is most definitely a different set of conditions operating in terms of what the proposed legal conditions and arrangements bring forward. The Animal Welfare Act, 1966 is the most prominent law operating in the country, which potentially provides the legal instrument in preventing animal cruelty, specifically in the federal level of governance (Sorenson, 2003). However, this act only seeks to prosecute animal cruelty only under specific conditions, including research, exhibition, transport and those who indirectly profit as a business. Among other criteria, there are also Endangered Species Act, 1973, which actually makes it illegal to kill an animal belonging to a recognized endangered species (World Wildlife Fund, 2020), and Preventing Animal Cruelty and Torture (PACT) Act, 2019, which makes egregious forms of animal cruelty like crushing, burning, drowning etc. of all animals a federal criminal offense (Sorenson, 2003). However, the most important responsibilities in these legal codes within the jurisdiction of states, which tend to offer laws that differ significantly. As a balancing case, local governments of counties and cities also provide necessary statutes of directing and presenting possible equitability in the law of recognizing animal cruelty even if their respective states should not recognize many of the required clauses and sections.
In terms of protecting animal feeders, the question associates directly with most state and local laws instituting legal statutes, policies and conditions, mainly on the basis of companion animals and protecting wildlife (Srinivasan, 2013). Feeders could specify their attention in any specific direction, but it certainly poses a problem wherein the possible distinctions could not be made (World Wildlife Fund, 2020). These laws have lately started associating with some notable directions of presenting ‘hands on’ scenario to effectively require reduction of harmful conditions and circumstances (Kelch, 2012). All these points are all significantly associative of presenting and constituting important factors (Kelch, 2012), which show the apparent failure to recognize such occurrences and the problems that could be faced.
As one can effectively witness, the apparent distinctions and differences between animal cruelty laws and those protecting animal feeders are notable in India and the United States (Kelch, 2012). However, there is certainly consistent trends, which need to be address in terms of the contexts, conditions and specificity covered under these grounds at large. (World Wildlife Fund, 2020) These would comprise the overall conditions, which would provide the necessary grounds of performing the exact research depending greatly upon the applying details.
1.3 Research Problem
The general specific conditions that apply to animal cruelty laws generally supply with the observations that they essentially fail at achieving their ultimate results. A number of possible reasons could apply to them, such as lack in proper enforcing, a wide extent of possible exemptions and other incidental factors (Kelch, 2012). The lack of proper, direct and actually effective composition of legal statutes addressing the topic need to be explored in terms of what different laws present under different jurisdictions. The matter with laws protecting animal feeders offers a different scenario at large, which evidently applies specifically to India in terms of instituting the conditions for cruelty animals may happen or take place (Kelch, 2012). However, the case of United States does not even go as effectively as it probably should (World Wildlife Fund, 2020). This opens up the question whether occurrences against animal feeders is as notable in many countries as they are in India, and what exactly constituted the proper definition of the term ‘animal feeder’ (World Wildlife Fund, 2020). These important questions all require helpful answers with the help of the constituting circumstance of research questions mentioned below.
1.4 Research Objectives
The conditions associated with presenting the necessary of objectives of this research are as follows:
To properly understand the ideas behind animal rights and welfare, which went in to establishing these laws.
To find proper explanation of the lack in context and background exactly why certain areas, small or big, of topic focus or area are not actually covered.
To establish the relations between laws about animal cruelty and laws that protect animal feeders.
Explain the significance behind the possible conditions with respect to the challenges over the outcome of justice.
To underscore improvements in these laws in certain directions and why exactly such things need to take place.
1.5 Research Questions
The effective conditions that lie beneath specifying the exact answers, and what they actually mean or be defined by could be distilled into a research question to be answered fully and acceptably at the end of research. This may be shown as per the following:
What are the commonalities in laws against animal cruelty and those for protecting animal feeders in different countries, and what exact relations do they offer between each other?
Dear sir madam, Thank you and appreciated your good output. I was really worried about this assignment because the deadline was already passed however you gave me the final document with experts assistance that was really great and I’m satisfied with the final solution. Thanks again
highly satisfied to give assessments when we are too busy and cannot summit our task on time.
Great service… Quick response… Nicely judge the requirements of the assignment… It seems like exert has gone through the specifications very carefully… I would prefer same expert again when I will have database assignment again in future… Thanks very much…
5 starts for following the requirements in the first go, extensively researched, to the point discussion in the research paper. Referencing seems to be on point. Excellent writer Good work, Cheers!!
This assignment i go r23.5/30 I’m happy your high quality work Thanks for helping
I recommend all my friends . They always get work done in emergency . Experts are too good . Provide them wid notes as well
good writers i love your assignment a lot. lot of value for your assignment. good website. lots of helpful to students.
Definitely gave me the help that I needed for this course. I would recommend my assignment help to anyone.
On time and great work. Simulation and paragraphs. You made it according to template. Thank you.
Good work done by MAH team. Very good understanding of the topic and hit it right.
I want u to do my next assignments..i will talk with the management i hope they can figure it out..our presentation n some contents are really good…G …
thank you very much for your help good assignment on time delivery and good work..
great assignment, was very excellent and passed it with no problems, really appreciate thanks
Original work and affordability are the biggest reasons for me to hire them over and over again. I like their professionalism and services. Keep up the good work.
The topic was too tricky for me to understand and that’s why I sought writing support from them. They met all my requirements and did justice to my order. Wonderful service!
I was expecting to receive the document in Harvard referencing style, but I actually got it in Oxford. I immediately approached them, and they got my work done according to me in a day. They didn’t ask for money on the changes made. Thanks guys!
I found them very professional as they quickly respond to the urgent requests. I wanted them to work on a few things in my final order, and they did it exactly as per my specifications without charging any extra money. Good services!
I found it hard to place an order with them as the line was constantly busy. But through their mobile App, it has become simple to approach them. I got my assignment on time, and it was nicely written. Highly recommended.
It takes a lot of time to research on an assignment topic given by the professor. I as I wanted to save my time, I simply contacted them via email and got their respond then and there. They followed all the specifications given. Thanks guys!
I wanted them to do certain changes in my document as I wasn’t satisfied at first. But, the writer assigned to me did the rework and sent me the order just in a day. Thanks guys! Good services. Marsha Marshall ,USA
live in London, and most of the time I travel owing to my work responsibilities. I got to know about them from a friend, and it’s been quite a while that their expert team of writers is supporting me with the college projects. I’m highly satisfied with their services. Keep doing a good job!
Scored good grades Due to time constraints, I hired them, and they handled the entire task amazingly. I submitted my order within the deadlines. I scored good grades, thanks guys!
I never knew they could be of such a great support. My order was written excellently and the format used was correct as well. Keep up the good work!
I needed help with my order from someone whom I can rely on completely. A buddy suggested me to hire them. They are really best at their work. I got my order on time.
Big thanks to the team of Instant Assignment Help as they delivered me the order just in time. Their customer support executives were available even at odd hours to resolve my urgent queries.
Good services! I found them very professional as they always keep in mind the requirements shared by their clients. Keep up the good work.
The format used was just like the way I wanted. I never thought they could write my document so well. I will surely recommend them to my friends.
While writing my assignment, I got confused about the referencing style that I had to use, and that is why I thought to seek help from their experts. To my surprise, I got exactly what my college professor wanted.
I wanted my writer to draft my order according to the specifications made and owing to some miscommunication; he forgot to mention some of the important points. But when I told him to do the changes, he did the rework patiently. I’m happy with their services.
Online writing companies charge high prices for their services, and this was the reason why I never thought to take writing support online. But Instant Assignment Help is different from others. They deliver a good quality document at affordable prices. Highly recommended!
Their services are fine as I can see there’s still room for improvement. I told them to use Vancouver referencing style, but mistakenly they used Oxford. The changes were made instantly when I asked them to.
As per the taxation Laws to Australia, a visitor visiting Australia is liable to pay tax. However, there are certain aspects of that are being checked to ensure the fact that the tax liability being imposed is at par the guidelines of Australian taxation laws.